Any guided discussions online are for the sole and primary purpose of creating a timeline of positive discussions which can be filtered and organized sorted accordingly based upon interpretation or by what is valued from what has been written. That is the primary purpose of a blog, to have some thoughts recorded, an elaborate timeline of thoughts, or of processing events and disclosures made by others, that’s no ones duty to record their thoughts, but it is very generous or those who so willingly share their two cents. Whenever it gets noisy there follows a period of disorganization, followed by hyperactivity of thoughts, either past or presently associated to whats currently going on, and then a more formal approach taken.
If any discussion requires continued discussion then it is not helpful as about others, specifically, but wastes more time, and causes more harm than good. There are times when looking at someone you are certain they are in the wrong, or certain they are someone they are not, or certain that things are about them, and to make about them, be certain, cause the sharing of stories, to include them to cast you out as described as apart of a class of individuals who have knowingly caused harm to others, that would be utilizing characters in a story in jest to cause suicide knowingly to someone who as through the process of defending themselves, become physically and mentally ill, wasting energy to describe running on the beach. That’s a purposeful infliction of emotional distress, and mental illness, to someone who is minding their own business, to cast likeness toward and push for suicide toward as people famously past have committed suicide in the face of prosecution, running on the beach in headphones because my headphones kept breaking, is a $300 investment, not to be apart of, I did not buy pink headphones I bought a color that no one has, please leave me alone. #stopsuicide
If a guided discussion is required to stop suicide or stop suicide attempts, then it become me justifying why I am made sick by others, and that its not deserved then further proof is required, and then blame is placed upon others, as deserving of negative voices and suicide, no I do not deserve negative voices and suicide, I deserve to live, and have earned it, attending two law school, working this year and writing 5 books, I do not deserve attack this year as well.
If a guided discussion is required … that only leaded to continued disruption of mental health and well being, reinforcing illness, not helping others to think well. Once you start naming names, and citing to stories, for reference, then all stories from your life, get referenced, and based upon what is known about you, harm is justified, however suicide is not justified, that is just communicating to the opposition, that their use of force is justified in affecting your ability to work or write in peace, as though you are under the influence of hate, when it is they who as reacting to you, are under the influence of hate toward you, to which you are now responding to many months later, no harm is justified in either case, where mutual understanding and compassion cannot be provided, a separation is required of individuals, why I got a gym membership, just because I am not fit to run on the beach, does not require hate toward me to remove me from the beach, everyone deserves to go to the beach, its not owned by anyone.
If a guided discussion is required, and an unsettling response provided having had this discussion, then allow people time to heal, and move on, with their lives, not reinforce negative judgments of them until (I commit suicide) I have moved on, do not attack me. If you don’t like me ... don't cause me suicide or mental illness, thank you.
Leslie A. Fischman